Abstract
In
“
The Evidence of Experience
”
Joan Scott challenged the philosophical accounts thatsupport identity politics based on the fact that this tradition puts the razonability of the claims and the ef
fi
ciency of this policies at risk. Multiples responses have been giv-en to this argument, but the most profound and sharpest critiques were introduced bythe Realist Post-positivist Programme. This theory, developed by Satya Mohanty andet al, tries to give an alternative consideration of the notion of
“
subjective experience
”—
antiessencialist (this is the reason for his antipositivism) but the opposite to the pos-modernist deconstructive dissolution of this term (this is the reason for his realism).In this paper I analyze both positions and I will try to give a consideration on my ownin order to offer a better and more ef
fi
cient response to identity-claims.
“
The Evidence of Experience
”
Joan Scott challenged the philosophical accounts thatsupport identity politics based on the fact that this tradition puts the razonability of the claims and the ef
fi
ciency of this policies at risk. Multiples responses have been giv-en to this argument, but the most profound and sharpest critiques were introduced bythe Realist Post-positivist Programme. This theory, developed by Satya Mohanty andet al, tries to give an alternative consideration of the notion of
“
subjective experience
”—
antiessencialist (this is the reason for his antipositivism) but the opposite to the pos-modernist deconstructive dissolution of this term (this is the reason for his realism).In this paper I analyze both positions and I will try to give a consideration on my ownin order to offer a better and more ef
fi
cient response to identity-claims.